The Secret Ingredient for Church Planting
Has CPM become a fad? I was in the meeting where the term “Church Planting Movement” was coined. It was an attempt by a group of mission practitioners and strategists to describe what we were observing in several countries as we took seriously our understanding of the Great Commission’s charge to go and make disciples of all peoples, baptize them into local churches, and teach them to obey all the commands of Christ.
None of us, in our wildest dreams, ever thought we would witness what was happening. Our initial goals were to see “beachhead” churches established in very resistant or very inaccessible locations and people groups. Note! We planned on establishing a single church where there was none. We had no plans for seeing hundreds or thousands of churches started. We didn’t think it was possible in the places we were trying to reach. These places had demonstrated their resistance to the Gospel, to Church Planting, and any other outside influence. We were just doing everything we could think of in hopes that something would work and at least one church would get started. We defined “success” as one church being started in a people group where there was none.
As one of the first in my denomination to take on this challenge, I had no clue how to make it happen. My wife and I were considered successful church planters. We were risk takers willing to try new things. Perhaps, most importantly, we were not afraid of failure. In the event of failure we would just try something else.
We were trained in research skills. We discussed access and evangelism techniques. We developed prayer networks, security protocols, and communication and administration systems. As a result of research, I knew that reaching “our” people group could not depend on me, because I did not have access. I knew that this people group would not respond to outsiders, because their history was full of wars resisting outside influence. But still, I had no clue how to make it happen.
God began to teach me through many failures that I had to focus on making Disciples of Christ, not followers of my church or denomination, and teach them to obey all the commands of Jesus, not my church/denominational doctrines or traditions. And this is what led to the breakthrough that has resulted in more than 40,000 churches among a people who were once considered unreachable.
Many people use the term “CPM” to describe or justify what they are doing. But, on closer examination, I find that many groups who use this term are simply applying it to what they have always done. CPM is not a method! It is an observation of results. In my experience, and this is what I teach, CPM is the result of obedience-based discipleship that sees disciples reproducing disciples, leaders reproducing leaders, and churches reproducing churches. If this is not happening, it is not CPM.
True CPM methodology is about being disciplined in education, training, and mentoring to obey all the commands of Jesus, regardless of consequences. The results are not quick. They only appear to be quick because of exponential growth. When one is truly engaged in the process that leads to observable CPM, then one is spending years investing in leaders. The typical investment timeline is two to four years. But, because of the replication process due to obedience to make disciples and teach them to obey, in this same two to four years, as many as five more leaders, who are also developing more leaders, will emerge. Each leader is investing two to four years in other leaders who invest two to four years in other leaders, and so on. The apparent result is explosive growth that does not seem to take much time and energy. But appearances are misleading.
CPM is extremely time and energy intensive. Leaders invest a major portion of their time in equipping other leaders. Churches invest in starting more groups that will become churches as they obey the teachings of Christ and begin to fulfill the nature and functions of church, which means they teach others to do the same.
There were no visible or measureable results the first four years of my ministry among a very resistant unreached people group. My mission was ready to discipline me for failure to do my job. But during those years I was equipping five leaders. These five leaders began to equip twenty-five more leaders, who in turned equipped hundreds of other leaders.
A few churches became more churches as leaders were equipped and trained to obey all the commands of Christ. More churches became hundreds of churches as the leadership equipping process continued. Every leader has years invested in him or her by other leaders. Nothing is quick. It only appears to be quick because more and more leaders are being produced in obedience to the command of Christ to “go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them inthe name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.” (Matthew 28:19-20, NIV)
So, CPM rapid multiplication really isn’t. We go slow in order to appear to go fast. We invest extensively in one in order to reach and train many. Our goal is to add at least two new leaders to our mentoring process each year, and equip the new leaders to do the same every year. As leaders multiply, churches grow and multiply.
If you really want to have CPM anywhere in the world, invest in teaching, training and mentoring leaders to obey all the commands of Christ. If you want to evaluate a so-called CPM, examine the discipleship and leadership equipping process. Real and lasting CPMs invest heavily in leadership and training. CPM is a result, not a cause.
Blessings!
David Watson
In the air over Africa
Trackback URL for this post:
- David Watson's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Technorati Tags:
Comments
Should we practice what we've observed?
David,
I'm a new reader of your blog and am enjoying it. Your clarification that CPM characteristics are observations of results rather than methods is a good one that I think bears repeating often. So here's a question I've wrestled with:
When you read Garrison's CPM book, he outlines certain things that are always present in CPMs. So to what extent, if at all, should we practice those things, knowing that, at least until now, they've always been part of a CPM? Do we stick to cell/house churches and lay leadership, because those have been universal elements? Or do we not worry about it? I'm a church-planting missionary in an unreached area of southern Mexico, and it takes some active convincing to keep our disciples from wanting to build church buildings early on.
Thanks for the thoughts and ideas you're sharing on your blog!
Chris L
blog at www.leakespeak.com
Critical Elements
Hi, Chris. This is a great question, and I am actually in the process of writing a blog entry to address this issue. The quick answer is that part of strategy is moving in measurable steps towards an objective. If our objective is CPM, then we know there are some steps we must take. These steps are the critical elements. "Critical" means that if the element is missing, success will not happen. But, each situation may require a different way to fulfill each step. Evangelism, for example, may require different forms based on cultural context. One size does not fit all. So, the way you plan and implement the evangelism step may look quite different from the way I would do it, but both of us have to complete it. What does lay leadership look like? In one culture it may be pluralistic and consensus based. In another culture it may be centered in one person and very directive in style. This is the reason I say that CPM is not a methodology, it's an observed outcome. There are common and critical elements in all CPMs. As a strategist I am going to make sure that the critical elements are put in place, and I am going to carefully examine common elements. But, my context may cause me to do things differently, and as a result, the method would look different than the same critical element would look and feel in a different context.
Let me try another analogy. Many people have had the goal of winning the summit of Mount Everest. It is known what equipment is desired, what physical conditioning is needed, what skills the team should have, and the mental fortitude that is required for a team to make it to the summit. But every team is very different from other teams who have succeeded. Numbers of team members vary, amount and manufacturer of equipment differs, and even different routes are chosen. But all critical elements are known, and the goal is always the same. Make it to the top! Not all succeed, even though they have all the information from prior successes and failures.
CPM should always be our goal as strategists. We want to see self-replicating disciples, leaders, groups, and churches. But not every effort will succeed, even though we have the success and failure records of those who have gone before us.
I am currently involved in 8 separate, very promising, movements on three different continents. There was very high intentionality in putting together the teams and training them. I know that all will have some success in church planting as we shoot for the summit of CPM. I also know that not all 8 will make it to the top. In the same way that not every group we start will become a church, not every movement begun will succeed. But I will continue to start Bible studies, because I know some of them will become churches. I will continue to strategize and plan for CPMs, because I know some of them will produce fruit far beyond anything else that could be done.
Bottom line: Put the critical elements in place. (There are 20 on my list, which I will be sharing in future posts.) Pray the Holy Spirit chooses to initiate a CPM. Hope that we don’t do anything to mess it up. The three rules of CPM are:
1. Discipleship – a disciple is one who makes more disciples
2. Discipleship – a leader is one who makes more leaders
3. Discipleship – a church is one who makes more churches
Blessings!
David Watson
Irving, Texas
How are critical elements determined?
Thanks for the reply, David. What you're saying makes good sense, if I'm understanding you correctly. We need to determine what the critical elements are, and then put them into practice. The method of fulfilling the critical elements, such as the implementation of lay leadership, will look different in each CPM.
This still leaves me with a bit of a question of how the critical elements are determined. Because something has been observed as a common element of current CPMs, does that make it a critical factor that we need to focus on implementing when working towards future CPMs? The main two universal elements (from Garrison's list--his is the only one I've read) I'm wondering about are the ones I think would be most likely to be disputed as critical factors--cell/house churches and lay leadership. Common sense seems to say that of course God is bigger than a certain "wineskin", so building church buildings isn't a problem, but history so far says that only movements centered around small groups in homes and storefronts have reached full-blown CPM level. So, to put it another way, I guess I'm wondering what role should history play in determining critical factors for the future?
If I'm getting ahead of you with future posts you plan to write, then I can hang on and read what you write later on. I'll be looking forward to reading about your list of 20 critical elements. Thanks a lot for your time, David! Have a great trip!
Chris L
blog at www.leakespeak.com
Determining Critical Elements
We review critical elements each time we have a team meeting. These elements are a combination of commands from the Bible, and what we have observed in our work and other work in numerous countries. We constantly ask if each element is indeed critical. Over the last 15 years the list has stabilized to 20 critical elements. Almost every year we try to condense the list or eliminate elements from the list. We ask, "What will happen to the movement process if we eliminate this element?" If there is significant negative impact we don't eliminate it. Sometimes new elements are suggested. We have not added a new element in several years. I will be doing a post on these elements, so will not go into them here. More later...
Blessings!
David Watson
Makes sense
Okay, that makes sense. I'll look forward to reading about the 20 critical elements you all have come up with!
Chris L
blog at www.leakespeak.com
How are critical elements determined?
Sorry for the double post here. The first time I tried to post it said the comment I was replying to didn't exist, but it still apparently posted my comment. It doesn't look like I'm able to delete the duplicate.
Chris
Thanks for the clarification.
David,
You post was timely for me - I believe that the Lord must have had you write this just for my benefit! I must address a group of our potential church planters in early December and I was struggling as to just how to overcome statements of "Let's start a CPM..." and the like. From the training in Arlington, I remember that "we" can't start a CPM - it is a sovereign move of God. I was trying to find a concise way to say "CPM is not a method! It is an observation of results" - your post has given me what I need.
Blessings,
David D.
Re: The Secret Ingredient for Church Planting
Hi David, I got a clarification reading this article. I have always thought that CPM is a method. Now, I understand that it is not. It is result. And there is a/some methodology (ies) that lead to it. Can we then say that the methodology will depend on the context where we want to see CPM happen? Can we say that not all principles will apply everywhere? Blessings! Younoussa.
Principles, Processes, Strategies, and Methodologies
Principles and processes to develop strategies and methodologies do not change from place to place. But the place will determine the tools we develop using these principles and processes. I am going to repost my Strategy and Stucture article. This may help clarify some issues.